Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Fire Sciences
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horrocks, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Price, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Quantification of Zinc Hydroxystannate and Stannate Synergies in Halogen-containing Flame-retardant Polymeric Formulations

A. Richard Horrocks*, Gill Smart, Shonali Nazaré, Baljinder Kandola, and Dennis Price

Centre for Materials Research and Innovation, University of Bolton, Bolton, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: A.R.Horrocks{at}bolton.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Zinc stannate and hydroxystannate are used as synergists in fire-retardant systems in conjunction with halogenated species where their behavior is generally considered to be similar to antimony-containing synergists while offering the additional properties of smoke suppression and relative nontoxicity. The literature most often compares relative synergistic behaviors qualitatively but this article determines such behavior quantitatively using Lewin’s synergistic effectiveness parameter, ES, calculated from sample limiting oxygen index (LOI) data. Flame-retardant formulations comprising zinc stannate (ZS), zinc hydroxystannate (ZHS), or antimony III oxide (ATO) in combination with selected and polymer-compatible bromine-containing flame retardants were formulated in commercial grades of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC)), thermoset polyester resin, and polyamide 6. PVC formulations simulated both commercial cable and plastisol applications and comprised either a phthalate or aryl phosphate ester as plasticizer in combination with selected synergists. All formulations were subjected to flammability testing using LOI, UL94 (vertical sample mode), and cone calorimetric (including smoke analysis) methods. For all PVC/synergist combinations containing the phthalate plasticizer, synergy was evident with 2.0 > ES > 1.0 and a relative effectiveness order ATO > ZHS > ZS. Zinc borate present as a cosynergist also has a quantifiable, positive effect. In the presence of the phosphate ester plasticizer, the reverse order is observed with marginal levels of synergy being evident (1.2 > ES > 1.0). In polyester resin formulations, ATO and ZHS exhibit similar levels of synergy when present with dibromoneopentyl diglycol with the former being superior when decabromodiphenyl ether is the flame retardant. However, in all polyamide 6 formulations, the highest levels of synergistic effectiveness are observed (ES ≥ 5.0) with ZS. Maximum values of ES correspond to a molar ratio of Sn/Br<0.3 suggesting the formation of SnBr2 and SnBr4 as the effective flame-retarding species.

First published on September 9, 2009
Journal of Fire Sciences 2009, doi:10.1177/0734904109344302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?